Subject: Re: Grand Unification Theory (XSL/XPointer) From: Duane Nickull <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 10:36:49 -0700 |
BRavo, Didier, Bravo!!!! Someone had to speak up! Here is my two cents, quoted directly from the w3.org <quote interpretation="Duane Nickull's view"> "XML (*AND* it's relatives like XSL, Xlink & XPointer) will ~ Make it easy for people to process data using inexpensive software Allow people to display information the way they want it </quote> <extrapolation> No one should loose sight of the word "easy" in the second sentence. Too many choices = confusion. Too many ways to perform one task = confusion. </extrapolation> <opinion> XSL and XPointer must remain on the track on it's(XML's) original mandate. We all saw what happened to HTML. Let's not make the same mistake twice. I am for unification of XSL and XPointer. </opinion> Duane Nickull XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Grand Unification Theory (XSL/X, Didier PH Martin | Thread | RE: Grand Unification Theory (XSL/X, Nantapon Chaimunkong |
Re: Problem instantiating XMLDOMDoc, Guy_Murphy | Date | Re: Problem instantiating XMLDOMDo, Duane Nickull |
Month |