Subject: Re: HTML is a formatting/UI language was: RE: Formatting Objects considered harmful From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 17:31:43 -0500 |
Håkon Wium Lie wrote: > > There is a small cost involved in the server-side conversion, yes. But > you can still do the client side processing since all your data is > still there. In this case it is, but in general it isn't. How do we carry forward attribute values? Multiended Xlinks? Complex RDF properties? > What you gain is accessibility. What does it matter if the transformation is done on the client or the server as long as it can be done? -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco "The Excursion [Sport Utility Vehicle] is so large that it will come equipped with adjustable pedals to fit smaller drivers and sensor devices that warn the driver when he or she is about to back into a Toyota or some other object." -- Dallas Morning News XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: HTML is a formatting/UI languag, Håkon Wium Lie | Thread | RE: HTML is a formatting/UI languag, Jonathan Borden |
Re: Grand Unification Theory, Chris Lilley | Date | Re: Grand Unification Theory, Paul Prescod |
Month |