Subject: Re: <xsl-script> From: Paul Prescod <paul@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 19:48:45 -0500 |
James Robertson wrote: > > Now, I'm in favour of a <script> tag. Otherwise, XSLT will be forced > to be everything for everyone. A truly huge beast. How so? XSLT has an extension mechanism already. Why would an unstructured, unintegrated <script> tag do better than the current mechanism? -- Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco Diplomatic term: "Regret" Translation: To care, but not enough to condemn. ("We regret the loss of life in Sierra Leone. We have no intention to do anything to stop it, mind you, but we regret that it happened.") (Brills Content, Apr. 1999) XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: <xsl-script>, James Robertson | Thread | Re: <xsl-script>, Guy_Murphy |
Re: <xsl-script>, John E. Simpson | Date | Re: <xsl-script>, Matthew MacKenzie |
Month |