Subject: RE: Please help with XSL proselytizing From: "Sall, Ken" <ksall@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 14:15:50 -0400 |
Just so we're all on the same page, the debate relates to these recent XML.com articles: XSL Considered Harmful by Michael Leventhal http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/1999/05/xsl/xslconsidered_1.html http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/1999/05/xsl/XSLCompare.html #part 2 main points: XSL Has Nothing New for the Web XSL Does Not Support Interactive Web Documents Semantic Information Threatened by XSL XSL is an Ugly, Difficult Language XSL has Set Back the Web at least 2 Years What's the Big Deal with XSL? by G. Ken Holman http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/1999/04/holman/xsl.html Framing the XSL Debate and XML Support in IE 5 http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/1999/05/xsl/EdNote.html http://www.xml.com/xml/pub/1999/03/ie5/first-x.html - Ken Sall ksall@xxxxxxx,kensall@xxxxxxxx,ken@xxxxxxxx - XML at Web Dev Virtual Lib http://WDVL.com/Authoring/Languages/XML/ > -----Original Message----- > From: G. Ken Holman [mailto:gkholman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, May 21, 1999 7:43 AM > To: XSL List > Subject: Please help with XSL proselytizing > > > Hello all! > > The XSL community of users needs your help in an interactive forum on > www.XML.com where a public discussion has been invited > regarding comparing > XSL and CSS. > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Please help with XSL proselytiz, Heikki Toivonen | Thread | How To Compare Inside XSL, Anand A Tarkas , Gur |
Re: XT, HTML, and &nsbp;, David Carlisle | Date | RE: XSL at WWW8, Sall, Ken |
Month |