|
Subject: Re: Please help with XSL proselytizing From: "Guy Murphy" <guy-murphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 07:42:24 +0100 |
Hi David.
I'll use DSSSL or write my own XSL parser, and use them on the server.
Personaly I point blank refuse to go back to the days of over bloated script
applications. I also refuse to to be press ganged by browser vendors
marketing in public forums. If an MS rep declared war on DOM in a public
forum I'd be enclined to tell them to **** off. I see no reason to treat
DocZilla any differently :)
Mozilla doesn't want XSL but is happy enough with XUL. Somebody mention lack
of focus?
Cheers
Guy
----- Original Message -----
[SNIP]
>
> But there is a difference here. XSL will presumably be going to a vote
> of W3C to become a recommendation. What happens if these `xxx is harmful'
> threads result in a no vote?
>
> David
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Please help with XSL proselytiz, David Carlisle | Thread | RE: Please help with XSL proselytiz, Heikki Toivonen |
| format and initial-page-number attr, Elliotte Rusty Harol | Date | Re: SAX2 and XSLT processors, Oren Ben-Kiki |
| Month |