Subject: Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: Daniel Veillard <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:04:01 +0100 |
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:39:07PM -0800, Kurt Cagle wrote: > Daniel, > > If you didn't include explicit type conversions (which are a pain to deal > with anyway -- I spend entirely too much time with Saxon 7.3 debugging type > conversion code in XSLT2) do you think you could create something that is > functionally compliant? I was rather hoping to see a version of libxslt for > XSLT2/XPath2 soon. I'm not sure I fully understand your question. The problem is that starting an implementation of a spec knowing you don't have the tools to implement 100% of it is like jumping from a cliff not knowing the depth of the water below :-\ Honnestly don't hold your breath for XSLT2/XPath2 support in libxslt/libxml2 this sounds a large effort also with big prerequisites. Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Kurt Cagle | Thread | Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Kurt Cagle |
RE: [xsl] replace value using two , Roger Glover | Date | Re: [xsl] 10 records per page, J.Pietschmann |
Month |