Subject: Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2003 23:36:42 +0100 |
But all that has no value if it won't be widely implemented, which can only happen if (at leat some of the) implementers (of the currently popular processors) can implement it, and see value in doing so.there is also little values in specs that are not fully implemented
if each tool/vendor has it's own supported subset you end up with something terrible for the users.
"I can't implement a specification I don't understand."Hum, there might have been a misunderstanding,
then that means that other implementers probably have rightful concerns about the current draft as well.
I didn't said that for XPath2/XSLT2 but for XML Schemas Structure.
-- http://www.pinkjuice.com/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Daniel Veillard | Thread | Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Daniel Veillard |
[xsl] XPath question, cknell | Date | Re: [xsl] XPath question, David Carlisle |
Month |