Subject: Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) From: "Kurt Cagle" <cagle@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:05:11 -0800 |
Daniel, Never mind. You answered the question I didn't state very well. I've brought up the too tight coupling between XPath2 and XSD, and while I understand that there are a lot of PSVI people that want to have that tight coupling, when you don't want it (which I suspect will be most of the time) it ends up adding a lot of complexity with little return. Oh well. -- Kurt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Veillard" <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 2:04 PM Subject: Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable? (was: N : M transformation) > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 01:39:07PM -0800, Kurt Cagle wrote: > > Daniel, > > > > If you didn't include explicit type conversions (which are a pain to deal > > with anyway -- I spend entirely too much time with Saxon 7.3 debugging type > > conversion code in XSLT2) do you think you could create something that is > > functionally compliant? I was rather hoping to see a version of libxslt for > > XSLT2/XPath2 soon. > > I'm not sure I fully understand your question. > The problem is that starting an implementation of a spec knowing you > don't have the tools to implement 100% of it is like jumping from a cliff > not knowing the depth of the water below :-\ > Honnestly don't hold your breath for XSLT2/XPath2 support in libxslt/libxml2 > this sounds a large effort also with big prerequisites. > > Daniel > > -- > Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ > veillard@xxxxxxxxxx | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ > http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Daniel Veillard | Thread | Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Tobias Reif |
Re: [xsl] is XSLT 2.0 implementable, Daniel Veillard | Date | Re: [xsl] N : M transformation, Daniel Veillard |
Month |