Re: [xsl] FO Processor choice

Subject: Re: [xsl] FO Processor choice
From: bry@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:37:27 CET
>It is not very
> stable, unfortunately, if it did less but 
consistently, it would be
> more useful.

I am not by any means a big fan of fop but 
I've found that a system can be built with 
it that handles most needs, if one is 
willing to sweat to do it. I'm not exactly 
sure what was meant by the above reference 
to needing consistency. I can't think of any 
fo document I've fed to it that came out 
looking different each processing instance, 
so I suppose that it lacks consistency in 
some other way - generally the sorts of 
inconsistency that strikes me more as 

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread