Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:14:07 +0400 (AMT) |
> From owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Tue Feb 3 17:03:55 2004 > From: bry@xxxxxxxxxx > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl > Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:39:45 CET > > declarative, functional? XSLT is not declarative, perl is as functional as XSLT. > conspires to destroy xslt? I just think that XSLT 2.0 is very close to Perl, Python and Ruby, just not yet as mature. What's the need for one more language in this family? David Tolpin http://davidashen.net/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, bry | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Robert Koberg |
Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, David Tolpin | Date | AW: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl, Ronald Kent Gibson |
Month |