Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl

Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl
From: Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 05:32:51 -0800
David Tolpin wrote:

From owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  Tue Feb  3 17:03:55 2004
From: bry@xxxxxxxxxx
To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT vs Perl
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:39:45 CET

declarative, functional?

XSLT is not declarative, perl is as functional as XSLT.

conspires to destroy xslt?

I just think that XSLT 2.0 is very close to Perl, Python and Ruby,
just not yet as mature. What's the need for one more language in
this family?

use what you feel comfortable. some of us like well-formedness and validity.

are you simply trolling, or do you really have a point?


XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread