Re: [xsl] Re: What is the future of XSL-FO

Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: What is the future of XSL-FO
From: David Tolpin <dvd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:40:54 +0400 (AMT)
> always broughts many problems to me. That's why I started an effort to
> replace this tool by something better (XSL-FO, actually). I'm just having
> problems with finding an open source library for .NET. I tried NFOP, which
> is the .NET port of Apache FOP, but it did not work in my tests; I'm still
> sweating to make it work.

Why do you need an open-source tool? How will your project benefit
from the formatter being open-source?

David Tolpin

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread