Re: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2.0?

["M. David Peterson" <m.david.x2x2x@xxxxxxxxx>]

AMEN!


On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:48:14 +1100, Dimitre Novatchev
<dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Sadly, many other tools do not cover the whole schema specification,
> > which make
> > them more or less useless in combination whith an advanced schema as defined
> > for XSLT 2.
> 
> I already expressed the same thoughts to Mike in a private communication.
> 
> I understand the need to have a state-of-the-art xml schema for XSLT
> 2.0, however at the same time the practical needs of today's tools
> require less subtle schemas to be developed so that they can be
> usable.
> 
> So why not have two schemas from the XSLT 2.0 WG: the current one with
> all bells and whistles and a much simpler one that will be easily and
> immediately dropable in most of today's not so clever schema-oriented
> text editors?
> 
> Cheers,
> Dimitre Novatchev.
> 
> 


-- 
<M:D/>

:: M. David Peterson ::
XML & XML Transformations, C#, .NET, and Functional Languages Specialist