RE: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2.0?

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

RE: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2.0?

Subject: RE: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2.0?
From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:09:47 -0000

> So why not have two schemas from the XSLT 2.0 WG: the current one with
> all bells and whistles and a much simpler one that will be easily and
> immediately dropable in most of today's not so clever schema-oriented
> text editors?

Someone can do it, but I don't enjoy writing code to work around the
undocumented limitations of buggy products, so I'm happy to leave that to
someone else.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

Current Thread
RE: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2.0?, (continued) Michael Kay - Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:22:00 -0000 Peter Gerstbach - Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:18:28 +0100 Dimitre Novatchev - Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:48:14 +1100 M. David Peterson - Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:50:59 -0700 Michael Kay - Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:09:47 -0000 <= Peter Gerstbach - Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:34:43 +0100 Mukul Gandhi - Wed, 16 Feb 2005 02:23:35 -0800 (PST) Michael Kay - Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:43:22 -0000 Hiral Parikh - Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:10:07 -0500

Current Thread

RE: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2.0?, (continued)
- Michael Kay - Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:22:00 -0000
  - Peter Gerstbach - Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:18:28 +0100
    - Dimitre Novatchev - Wed, 16 Feb 2005 05:48:14 +1100
    - M. David Peterson - Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:50:59 -0700
    - Michael Kay - Tue, 15 Feb 2005 19:09:47 -0000 <=
    - Peter Gerstbach - Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:34:43 +0100
    - Mukul Gandhi - Wed, 16 Feb 2005 02:23:35 -0800 (PST)
    - Michael Kay - Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:43:22 -0000
    - Hiral Parikh - Wed, 16 Feb 2005 17:10:07 -0500

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2., M. David Peterson	Thread	Re: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2., Peter Gerstbach
Re: [xsl] Bug in Schema for XSLT 2., M. David Peterson	Date	[xsl] EXSLT implementation in .NET, Karl Stubsjoen
	Month