Re: [xsl] Shorthand.

[Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx>]

It seems that my messages sometimes come through slowly, I don't know 
why, but it said the following:

> If you use this browser based, you cannot rely on EXSLT extensions 
> like exslt:function. If you use it server side, you can lookup the 
> documentation of your processor whether (and how) it supports 
> exslt:function or not.

hope that answers your question (and of course, consider the other 
options without params proposed by most of the repliers if exslt is not 
for you).

Cheers,

--Abel Braaksma




Steve wrote:
> Something like this in XSL 1.0 would be great. Anyone?
>
>
> On 7/25/07, Angela Williams <Angela.Williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > (Not tested)
> > <xsl:function name="my:ajax-link">
> >   <xsl:param name="href" select="'x'"/>
> >   <xsl:param name="text" select="'y'"/>
> >   <a href="{$href}" onClick="showData('{$href}');return
> > false;"><xsl:value-of select="$text" /></a>
> >
> > </xsl:function>
> >
> > <value-of select="my:ajax-link($href, $text)"/>
> >
> > I'm not very familiar with the ins and outs of 1.0 , but I don't know of
> > a less verbose way to call a named template in either version....