Re: [xsl] Shorthand.

[Steve <subsume@xxxxxxxxx>]

Doh. Sorry. Server side. I use exslt for other things, I've never
delved into :function.

-S

On 7/25/07, Abel Braaksma <abel.online@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It seems that my messages sometimes come through slowly, I don't know
> why, but it said the following:
>
> > If you use this browser based, you cannot rely on EXSLT extensions
> > like exslt:function. If you use it server side, you can lookup the
> > documentation of your processor whether (and how) it supports
> > exslt:function or not.
>
> hope that answers your question (and of course, consider the other
> options without params proposed by most of the repliers if exslt is not
> for you).
>
> Cheers,
>
> --Abel Braaksma
>
>
>
>
> Steve wrote:
> > Something like this in XSL 1.0 would be great. Anyone?
> >
> >
> > On 7/25/07, Angela Williams <Angela.Williams@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> (Not tested)
> >> <xsl:function name="my:ajax-link">
> >>   <xsl:param name="href" select="'x'"/>
> >>   <xsl:param name="text" select="'y'"/>
> >>   <a href="{$href}" onClick="showData('{$href}');return
> >> false;"><xsl:value-of select="$text" /></a>
> >>
> >> </xsl:function>
> >>
> >> <value-of select="my:ajax-link($href, $text)"/>
> >>
> >> I'm not very familiar with the ins and outs of 1.0 , but I don't know of
> >> a less verbose way to call a named template in either version....