Subject: Re: [xsl] XQuery basics From: Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:53:35 -0400 |
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 15:48 +0200, Michael Ludwig wrote: > Andrew Welch schrieb: > > Standalone schema-aware transforms, generating strict xhtml by > > transforming xml returned from various queries (where the xslt, xml, > > and xquery are all stored in the same database) could well be the most > > common use of 2.0 in the future. > > Storing the XSLT in the database? That is a common scenario for XML databases. I prefer the the file system for things like XSL or XQuery so it can easily be in a version control system. best, -Rob > > Michael Ludwig
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XQuery basics, Michael Ludwig | Thread | Re: [xsl] XQuery basics, Michael Ludwig |
Re: [xsl] XQuery basics, Michael Ludwig | Date | Re: [xsl] XQuery basics, Michael Ludwig |
Month |