Subject: Re: [xsl] XQuery basics From: Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:06:45 -0400 |
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 08:33 -0400, Liam Quin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 04:07:16PM -0400, Robert Koberg wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 15:29 -0400, Liam Quin wrote: > > > Are there things that we (W3C) should be standardising in that > > > area? > > > > Well, these would be web application specific. > > I'm not following you... do you mean that you feel W3C > should do more in the area of Web aplications (we are), o;? I meant that things like set/get-request-attribute('attrName') and o;?set/get-session-attribute('attrName') are specific to web applications (and maybe just java web applications). So, it would not make sense for a general tool like XSL to have a focus on web applications. I was kind of joking with Andrew (perhaps my smiley was not enough to indicate that). Andrew wants a way to use XSL files like some folk use JSP or PHP (or in the case of eXist and others, XQuery). I don't think it is a good idea from a memory (as Michael Kay reaffirmed in his post on this thread) and functionality standpoint. > or do > you mean that you think W3C's primary or only use case for > XSLT is for Web applications (it isn't)...? no > > Liam
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XQuery basics, Liam Quin | Thread | Re: [xsl] XQuery basics, Andrew Welch |
[xsl] self axis vs ., Andrew Welch | Date | Re: [xsl] writing to file from MSXM, Christian Wittern |
Month |