Subject: Re: [xsl] XQuery basics From: "Andrew Welch" <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 14:30:21 +0100 |
2008/6/6 Robert Koberg <rob@xxxxxxxxxx>: > I was kind of joking with Andrew (perhaps my smiley was not enough to > indicate that). Andrew wants a way to use XSL files like some folk use > JSP or PHP (or in the case of eXist and others, XQuery). I don't think > it is a good idea from a memory (as Michael Kay reaffirmed in his post > on this thread) and functionality standpoint. How isn't it a good idea from a functionality point of view... what language is better than XSLT at creating markup? Standalone schema-aware transforms, generating strict xhtml by transforming xml returned from various queries (where the xslt, xml, and xquery are all stored in the same database) could well be the most common use of 2.0 in the future. I hope it is, anyway. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XQuery basics, Robert Koberg | Thread | Re: [xsl] XQuery basics, Robert Koberg |
Re: [xsl] self axis vs ., Mukul Gandhi | Date | Re: [xsl] writing to file from MSXM, Joe Fawcett |
Month |