Subject: RE: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "can you sell an XSLT?" From: "Michael Kay" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:53:28 +0100 |
> Some kind of archive format would be really good - is > anything in the pipeline for 2.1? > > Something simple like: > > <xsl:include href="library.sar"/> > > where library.sar is "stylesheet archive", a standard zip > with some kind of meta pointing to the primary stylesheet. > We haven't done any serious work on this yet, but it's tentatively on the agenda. Not so much an archive format as such, but rather, language changes to make separate compilation of modules a realistic proposition. At the moment it's a non-starter, because almost anything you assume to be true when you compile a library module can be overridden when you import it from a new top-level module. Regards, Michael Kay http://www.saxonica.com/ http://twitter.com/michaelhkay
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "c, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "c, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] Re: Determining whether n, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] linkedin discussion of "c, Andrew Welch |
Month |