Subject: Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors? From: Vyacheslav Sedov <vyacheslav.sedov@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:31:05 +0300 |
surely no :) truly cooperation is much better then false competition :) 2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > Hi Andrew, > > Yes, well, my response to Vyacheslav was a tad rhetorical. > > So let's rephrase my original quandary yet again. > > "Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT for anything else other than Saxon/Java > (notwithstanding .Net autoport)), > does *any other* community really want one?" > > Regards > Justin Johansson > > > Andrew Welch wrote: >> >> I don't think "XRX" literally means just those 3 parts, it means an >> XML Server back end, XQuery and XSLT as the application code >> generating (X)HTML and/or XForms for the front end, passing around XML >> over http (some of the REST crowd get upset about using REST loosely) >> >> The key ingredients are the XML Server and the fact that its end-to-end >> XML. >> >> >> 2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >>> >>> An unexpected but nevertheless an interesting answer. >>> >>> FWIW, From the first sentence of the Wikipedia writeup on XRX: >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XRX_(web_application_architecture) >>> >>> "In software development XRX is a web application architecture based on >>> XForms, REST and XQuery." >>> >>> Not a mention of XSLT there so to challenge your response ... >>> >>> Would it be reasonable to rephrase my question as: >>> >>> "Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT 2 for XRX), does the XRX community really >>> want >>> one?" >>> >>> (Notwithstanding, and with no disrespect to, Saxon of course). >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Justin Johansson
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Justin Johansson | Thread | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Andrew Welch |
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Justin Johansson | Date | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Andrew Welch |
Month |