Subject: Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors? From: Vyacheslav Sedov <vyacheslav.sedov@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:16:52 +0300 |
XRX not mean XML databases only - for example you can use eXist-db only as application server just like any "standalone" application server and standalone database (maybe even not "xml-enabled" like MySQL) 2010/1/18 Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx>: > I don't think "XRX" literally means just those 3 parts, it means an > XML Server back end, XQuery and XSLT as the application code > generating (X)HTML and/or XForms for the front end, passing around XML > over http (some of the REST crowd get upset about using REST loosely) > > The key ingredients are the XML Server and the fact that its end-to-end XML. > > > 2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >> An unexpected but nevertheless an interesting answer. >> >> FWIW, From the first sentence of the Wikipedia writeup on XRX: >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XRX_(web_application_architecture) >> >> "In software development XRX is a web application architecture based on >> XForms, REST and XQuery." >> >> Not a mention of XSLT there so to challenge your response ... >> >> Would it be reasonable to rephrase my question as: >> >> "Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT 2 for XRX), does the XRX community really want >> one?" >> >> (Notwithstanding, and with no disrespect to, Saxon of course). >> >> Regards >> >> Justin Johansson >> >> > > -- > Andrew Welch > http://andrewjwelch.com > Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Andrew Welch | Thread | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Justin Johansson |
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Justin Johansson | Date | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Vyacheslav Sedov |
Month |