Subject: Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0 processors? From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:09:17 +0000 |
I don't think "XRX" literally means just those 3 parts, it means an XML Server back end, XQuery and XSLT as the application code generating (X)HTML and/or XForms for the front end, passing around XML over http (some of the REST crowd get upset about using REST loosely) The key ingredients are the XML Server and the fact that its end-to-end XML. 2010/1/18 Justin Johansson <procode@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > An unexpected but nevertheless an interesting answer. > > FWIW, From the first sentence of the Wikipedia writeup on XRX: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XRX_(web_application_architecture) > > "In software development XRX is a web application architecture based on > XForms, REST and XQuery." > > Not a mention of XSLT there so to challenge your response ... > > Would it be reasonable to rephrase my question as: > > "Given the neglect (i.e. XSLT 2 for XRX), does the XRX community really want > one?" > > (Notwithstanding, and with no disrespect to, Saxon of course). > > Regards > > Justin Johansson > > -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Justin Johansson | Thread | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Vyacheslav Sedov |
Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Vyacheslav Sedov | Date | Re: [xsl] Definite list of XSLT 2.0, Justin Johansson |
Month |