Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0

Subject: Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0
From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:04:20 +0100

On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:55:51 +0200
Martin Honnen <Martin.Honnen@xxxxxx> wrote:

> > Issue:
> >   What happens with tokenize when the separator is missing?
> > empty set? 
> 
> No, the first argument string is returned.
> 

Thanks Martin. Shouldn't have doubted David!


-- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Current Thread
[xsl] set union? xslt 2.0 Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 09:15:36 -0000 David Carlisle - 8 Apr 2010 09:26:09 -0000 Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 09:42:41 -0000 Martin Honnen - 8 Apr 2010 09:56:20 -0000 Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 10:04:37 -0000 <= David Carlisle - 8 Apr 2010 10:14:43 -0000 Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 10:47:32 -0000 David Carlisle - 8 Apr 2010 11:50:18 -0000 Andrew Welch - 8 Apr 2010 09:33:57 -0000

Current Thread

[xsl] set union? xslt 2.0
- Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 09:15:36 -0000
  - David Carlisle - 8 Apr 2010 09:26:09 -0000
    - Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 09:42:41 -0000
      - Martin Honnen - 8 Apr 2010 09:56:20 -0000
      - Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 10:04:37 -0000 <=
      - David Carlisle - 8 Apr 2010 10:14:43 -0000
      - Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 10:47:32 -0000
      - David Carlisle - 8 Apr 2010 11:50:18 -0000
  - Andrew Welch - 8 Apr 2010 09:33:57 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, Martin Honnen	Thread	Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, David Carlisle
Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, Martin Honnen	Date	Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, Andrew Welch
	Month