Subject: Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0 From: Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:08:45 +0100 |
On 8 April 2010 10:43, Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 10:33:38 +0100 > Andrew Welch <andrew.j.welch@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > xml source of the form >> > >> > <skillarea targets="data|general"> >> >> That ought to be changed to: >> >> <skillarea> >> <targets> >> <target>data</target> >> <target>general</target> > > > Can't do that on the command line for the params though Andrew? > > Still leaves one side with a string... Sure, but that's "the right way" to represent that in XML, then you can just pass in your delimited parameter and do: select="skillarea[targets/target = $targets]" where $targets is a top level variable created when you tokenize the param into a sequence of items. -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, Dave Pawson | Thread | Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, Dave Pawson |
Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, Dave Pawson | Date | Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, David Carlisle |
Month |