Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0

Subject: Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0
From: Dave Pawson <davep@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:47:12 +0100

On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:14:14 +0100
David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip/>

Thanks for the longer explanation David.

All now working.

Quotable quote?
"It's fairly natural to have implicit quantification since the basic
type  in xpath is a set 9xpat 10 or sequence (xpath 2) rather than
singltons."

I'm sure I could work that out if my keyboard had anything
engraved on the keycaps.




- 

regards 

-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, (continued) Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 09:42:41 -0000 Martin Honnen - 8 Apr 2010 09:56:20 -0000 Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 10:04:37 -0000 David Carlisle - 8 Apr 2010 10:14:43 -0000 Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 10:47:32 -0000 <= David Carlisle - 8 Apr 2010 11:50:18 -0000 Andrew Welch - 8 Apr 2010 09:33:57 -0000 Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 09:43:48 -0000 Andrew Welch - 8 Apr 2010 10:09:04 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, (continued)
- Andrew Welch - 8 Apr 2010 09:33:57 -0000
  - Dave Pawson - 8 Apr 2010 09:43:48 -0000
    - Andrew Welch - 8 Apr 2010 10:09:04 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, David Carlisle	Thread	Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, David Carlisle
Re: [xsl] set union? xslt 2.0, David Carlisle	Date	[xsl] problem with processing CDATA, Robby Pelssers
	Month