Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force

Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?
From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:31:56 +0100

On 29/10/2010 17:41, Costello, Roger L. wrote:

Your comparison of xslt and java (or of xslt programmers and java programmers) seems rather strange, and mostly reminded me of a comparison of HTML5 with competing technologies that I came across earlier today:

http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/2010/five-things-carrots-can-do-that-html5-cant/

David

Current Thread
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, (continued) Michael Kay - 29 Oct 2010 21:34:31 -0000 ac - 30 Oct 2010 04:28:35 -0000 ac - 30 Oct 2010 04:39:52 -0000 Max Toro - 30 Oct 2010 15:32:52 -0000 David Carlisle - 29 Oct 2010 21:32:09 -0000 <= Mukul Gandhi - 30 Oct 2010 00:00:41 -0000 Xmlizer - 30 Oct 2010 18:44:11 -0000 Stefan Krause - 31 Oct 2010 11:18:48 -0000 Michael Müller-Hillebrand - 31 Oct 2010 15:51:57 -0000

Current Thread

Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML?, (continued)
- Mukul Gandhi - 30 Oct 2010 00:00:41 -0000
- Xmlizer - 30 Oct 2010 18:44:11 -0000
- Stefan Krause - 31 Oct 2010 11:18:48 -0000
  - Michael Müller-Hillebrand - 31 Oct 2010 15:51:57 -0000

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, Max Toro	Thread	Re: [xsl] Are there things missing , Mukul Gandhi
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, G. Ken Holman	Date	Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, Michael Kay
	Month

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home