Subject: Re: [xsl] Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML? From: Michael Müller-Hillebrand <mmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:51:39 +0100 |
Am 31.10.2010 um 12:18 schrieb Stefan Krause: > I know that there are good reasons, why these functions are not part of XSLT. On the other hand, these lack of functionality is a massive handicap within a lot of common tasks. In all real-world projects I have seen the XSL transformation is only one step in a larger process that involves surrounding tasks. And I guess the number and type of such tasks is possibly infinite, if you start looking at the union of all projects instead of just your own. So, you'll never reach a point where all users would be satisfied... Given that, I rather have a tool that is very very good at what it is designed for. And build my own production environment around that as I need it. - Michael M|ller-Hillebrand -- ;If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail!+ (Maslow) Michael M|ller-Hillebrand: Documentation Technology Adobe Certified Expert, FrameMaker Consulting & Training, Automation, XML/XSL, Unicode Blog: http://cap-studio.de/ - Tel. +49 (0)9131 28747
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Are there things missing , Stefan Krause | Thread | RE: [xsl] Are there things missing , cknell |
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, Wolfgang Laun | Date | |
Month |