Subject: Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things missing in XSLT which force people to use, say, Java to process XML? From: Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 12:26:20 +0100 |
I'd guess this is due to XSLT 2.0 achieving more by less lines. On 31 October 2010 10:51, Michael Kay <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> It would be interesting to learn about some industry data, such as the number of >> lines of code resulting from and/or person years spent on a single >> XSLT project. >> > > You'll see some large numbers, but I'm not sure that's a good thing. The numbers for XSLT 2.0 are probably a lot smaller than the numbers for 1.0, which doesn't exactly mean that XSLT 2.0 is less suited to large-scale programming. > > Michael Kay > Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, Michael Kay | Thread | Re: [xsl] RE: Are there things miss, Michael Kay |
Re: [xsl] Are there things missing , Stefan Krause | Date | Re: [xsl] Are there things missing , Michael Müller-Hille |
Month |