Re: [xsl] A compelling use case for employing binary trees in XML processing?

Subject: Re: [xsl] A compelling use case for employing binary trees in XML processing?
From: Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 11:09:10 +0100
On 10/12/2012, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> A binary *search* tree (and I mean *balanced* binary serch tree) has
> more useful properties than just that it one of its serializations
> presents the values in sorted order.

Just a request for clarification: the code presented in

[1] http://dnovatchev.wordpress.com/2012/01/09/the-binary-search-tree-data-structurehaving-fun-with-xpath-3-0/

is not intended to implement a "balanced" tree?

-W

Current Thread