Subject: Re: [xsl] Numeric top-level predicates in patterns From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:30:22 -0700 |
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Abel Braaksma (Exselt) <abel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Selects nothing, ever (not even in a select-expression): > foo[2][3] True. A sequence is only flat -- it cannot be nested. We need to expect this behavior to be different for the forthcoming array type (which of course will use other kind of brackets for indexing) in XPath 3.1, because one of the important properties of an array should be that it can be nested, that is, at any index position in the array there could be another array or a sequence. -- Cheers, Dimitre Novatchev
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Numeric top-level predica, Abel Braaksma (Exsel | Thread | Re: [xsl] When to use text(), Eike Dierks |
Re: [xsl] Numeric top-level predica, Abel Braaksma (Exsel | Date | Re: [xsl] Numeric top-level predica, David Carlisle |
Month |