Re: [xsl] Numeric top-level predicates in patterns

Subject: Re: [xsl] Numeric top-level predicates in patterns
From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 10:30:22 -0700
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Abel Braaksma (Exselt) <abel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Selects nothing, ever (not even in a select-expression):
> foo[2][3]

True. A sequence is only flat -- it cannot be nested.

We need to expect this behavior to be different for the forthcoming
array type (which of course will use other kind of brackets for
indexing) in XPath 3.1, because one of the important properties of an
array should be that it can be nested, that is, at any index position
in the array there could be another array or a sequence.

Dimitre Novatchev

Current Thread