|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Initial whitespace in PI from XSLT, main body From: "Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 8 May 2022 19:02:19 -0000 |
> Do we want the behavior of almost all current XML processing tools to suddenly become "incompliant"? > Wendell is proposing an application-level house style for use of processing instructions, a rule for the next level up the protocol stack, which is perfectly legitimate. In fact I've heard others propose a stronger convention, namely that processing instructions should use the syntax of attribute="value" pairs, as in an element start tag: that's the design convention used for the xml-stylesheet processing instruction. Michael Kay Saxonica
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Initial whitespace in PI , Dimitre Novatchev dn | Thread | Re: [xsl] Initial whitespace in PI , Dimitre Novatchev dn |
| Re: [xsl] Initial whitespace in PI , Dimitre Novatchev dn | Date | Re: [xsl] Initial whitespace in PI , Dimitre Novatchev dn |
| Month |