Re: [xsl] How to count the distinct values where elements with missing child are counted as one of the distinct values?

Subject: Re: [xsl] How to count the distinct values where elements with missing child are counted as one of the distinct values?
From: "Wendell Piez wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 18:09:04 -0000
Hi,

Another question is whether one assumes that row elements with no
transition should be counted together as a single value, or separately as
distinct values (because undefined).

The original spec I think may have been ambiguous as to this question. ("I
want a count of the number of distinct transition values, where row
elements with no transition element are counted as 1".)

let $test := /test/row return count(distinct-values($test/transition)) +
count($test[not(transition)])

Also, although XPath was requested XSLT ain't so hard either

<xsl:for-each-group select="/test/row" group-by="transition">
  <xsl:sequence select="count(current-group())"/>
</xsl:for-each-group>

or some variant depending on your needs.

Cheers, Wendell






On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 11:10 AM Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx <
xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > Use count(distinct-values(/test/row/string(transition)))
>
> I would use the more obvious and self-explanatory:
>
> let $test := /test/row
>   return
>      count(distinct-values($test/transition)) + 1[$test[not(transition)]]
>
> If this XPath evaluation is initiated from an XSLT transformation and XSLT
> 1.0 compatibility set to true (Specifying version = "1.0" but using an XSLT
> 2.0 or later processor), one can use even:
>
>  count(distinct-values(/test/row/transition)) +
> boolean(/test/row[not(transition)])
>
>
> Thanks,
> Dimitre
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 7:33 AM Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx <
> xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Use count(distinct-values(/test/row/string(transition)))
>>
>> string() applied to an empty sequence returns the zero-length string,
>> whereas atomization applied to an empty sequence returns an empty sequence.
>>
>> Michael Kay
>> Saxonica
>>
>> > On 26 May 2022, at 15:08, Roger L Costello costello@xxxxxxxxx <
>> xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Folks,
>> >
>> > The following XML document has two row elements with no transition
>> element and two row elements with a transition element :
>> >
>> > <test>
>> >    <row>
>> >    </row>
>> >    <row>
>> >    </row>
>> >    <row>
>> >        <transition>ABC</transition>
>> >    </row>
>> >    <row>
>> >        <transition>DEF</transition>
>> >    </row>
>> > </test>
>> >
>> > I want a count of the number of distinct transition values, where row
>> elements with no transition element are counted as 1.
>> >
>> > So for the above XML document the count should return 3.
>> >
>> > This XPath seems to work:
>> >
>> > count(distinct-values(/test/row/transition)) +
>> count(/test/row[not(transition)][1])
>> >
>> > But I am wondering if there is a better (simpler, less kludgy) XPath
>> expression?
>> >
>> > /Roger
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Dimitre Novatchev
> ---------------------------------------
> Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
> ---------------------------------------
> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
> -------------------------------------
> Never fight an inanimate object
> -------------------------------------
> To avoid situations in which you might make mistakes may be the
> biggest mistake of all
> ------------------------------------
> Quality means doing it right when no one is looking.
> -------------------------------------
> You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
> you're doing is work or play
> -------------------------------------
> To achieve the impossible dream, try going to sleep.
> -------------------------------------
> Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
> -------------------------------------
> Typing monkeys will write all Shakespeare's works in 200yrs.Will they
> write all patents, too? :)
> -------------------------------------
> Sanity is madness put to good use.
> -------------------------------------
> I finally figured out the only reason to be alive is to enjoy it.
>
> XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list>
> EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/174322> (by
> email <>)
>


-- 
...Wendell Piez... ...wendell -at- nist -dot- gov...
...wendellpiez.com... ...pellucidliterature.org... ...pausepress.org...
...github.com/wendellpiez... ...gitlab.coko.foundation/wendell...

Current Thread