Subject: Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml editor, please? From: "Christophe Marchand cmarchand@xxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 10:13:02 -0000 |
Right ! But the point here was EMacs is able to work on very large files, and is a little bit easier than vi (according to some EMacs fans...) that as also some XML extensions... Christophe Le 17/08/2022 C 12:05, Peter Flynn peter@xxxxxxxxxxx a C)critB : > On 17 August 2022 09:51:25 "Christophe Marchand cmarchand@xxxxxxxxxx" > <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> [b&] For this kind of documents, prefer some simple text editors, like >> EMacs or others that are able to work woth large files. >> > > Not forgetting that Emacs has modes (packages) which make it a > fully-fledged XML editor. All open source. > > Peter > > > > XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list> > EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/2837134> > (by email <>)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml edi, Peter Flynn peter@xx | Thread | Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml edi, Peter Flynn peter@xx |
Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml edi, Peter Flynn peter@xx | Date | Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml edi, Peter Flynn peter@xx |
Month |