Subject: Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml editor, please? From: "Bauman, Syd s.bauman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:22:16 -0000 |
Or, to be more precise, Emacs/nxml-mode (editing an XML document and validating it against a RELAX NG compact syntax grammar as you go); there is also Emacs/psgml-mode for editing an XML document and validating it against a DTD. I think what has been posted here about Emacs is correct it is in some ways the best editor, for most anything. But it comes with a serious downside, too: it is not like any other tool you use or will use, and thus it is very difficult to learn to use well. But MSMcQs point about macro language is a very good one, IMHO. (I may be mildly biased having also grown up on XEDIT & Rexx : -) All that said, I also use oXygen. It is not perfect and has a lot of features I could not care less about, but I have never seen a commercial XML editor with a price/feature ratio anywhere near as good as oXygens. ________________________________ Relax-ng mode.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml edi, Dave Pawson dave.paw | Thread | Ris: [xsl] suggestion for an xml ed, Massimiliano Volpi m |
Re: [xsl] suggestion for an xml edi, C. M. Sperberg-McQue | Date | Ris: [xsl] suggestion for an xml ed, Massimiliano Volpi m |
Month |