|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Tag noxsl. An equivalent of tag noscript. From: "Schimon Jehudah sch@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 14:56:48 -0000 |
If so,then we should deprecate their products. Since over a couple of decades ago, it was planned to utilize XML (and XSLT) as 'HTML', not the SGML variant known as HTML5. Atom and XSLT suffice to publish content. We should ignore those that insist of ECMAScript and invalid XML (i.e. HTML). Schimon On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 13:35:53 -0000 "Willem Van Lishout willemvanlishout@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If the browser vendors get their way, this tag will become redundant > rather soon. > > On Jan 2, 2026, 11:30, at 11:30, "Schimon Jehudah sch@xxxxxxxxxxxx" > <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >Greetings. > > > >I was wondering, whether this could be a possible directive in HTML > >and XML documents. > > > ><noxsl> > > <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=?xsl=0"/> > ></noxsl> > > > >What do you think of it? > > > >Happy new year, > >Schimon
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Tag noxsl. An equivalent , Willem Van Lishout w | Thread | Re: [xsl] Tag noxsl. An equivalent , Michael Kay mike@xxx |
| Re: [xsl] grouping, Dave Pawson dave.paw | Date | Re: [xsl] grouping, David Carlisle d.p.c |
| Month |