Re: [xsl] Tag noxsl. An equivalent of tag noscript.

["Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Not sure what the intended semantics are, but in general it seems odd for data
to try and regulate what you are allowed to do with it.

Sent from my iPhone

> On 2 Jan 2026, at 14:57, Schimon Jehudah sch@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> o;?If so,then we should deprecate their products.
>
> Since over a couple of decades ago, it was planned to utilize XML (and
> XSLT) as 'HTML', not the SGML variant known as HTML5.
>
> Atom and XSLT suffice to publish content.
>
> We should ignore those that insist of ECMAScript and invalid XML (i.e.
> HTML).
>
> Schimon
>
>> On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 13:35:53 -0000
>> "Willem Van Lishout willemvanlishout@xxxxxxxxx"
>> <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> If the browser vendors get their way, this tag will become redundant
>> rather soon.
>>
>>> On Jan 2, 2026, 11:30, at 11:30, "Schimon Jehudah sch@xxxxxxxxxxxx"
>>> <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Greetings.
>>>
>>> I was wondering, whether this could be a possible directive in HTML
>>> and XML documents.
>>>
>>> <noxsl>
>>> <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=?xsl=0"/>
>>> </noxsl>
>>>
>>> What do you think of it?
>>>
>>> Happy new year,
>>> Schimon