|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Tag noxsl. An equivalent of tag noscript. From: "Liam R. E. Quin liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 21:30:12 -0000 |
On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 10:30:17 -0000 "Schimon Jehudah sch@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > <noxsl> > <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=?xsl=0"/> > </noxsl> Ibm guessing you really mean noxslt (xsl includes XSL-FO, the formatting spec). Is the idea that if XSLT is not supported in the browser, the browser will do a page reload adding xsl=0 to the URL? If so, you might conceivably get some traction from browser people, but the case where server is being maintained and someone can add markup is much less interesting to me than the case where pages and whole sites simply stop working. This particular suggestion has the disadvantages that any browser or agent that doesn't understand it will see the meta header, and also that if you put this in the head, the noxsl element ends the HTML head. Maybe you could use noscript instead, since if you have JavaScript available you could do a redirect from there by looking for window.xsltProcessor. liam -- Liam Quin: Delightful Computing - Training and Consultancy in XSLT / XML Markup / Typography / CSS / Accessibility / and more... Outreach for the GNU Image Manipulation Program Vintage art digital files - fromoldbooks.org
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Tag noxsl. An equivalent , Schimon Jehudah sch@ | Thread | Re: [xsl] Tag noxsl. An equivalent , Schimon Jehudah sch@ |
| Re: [xsl] Tag noxsl. An equivalent , Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | Re: [xsl] Tag noxsl. An equivalent , Schimon Jehudah sch@ |
| Month |