Re: [xsl] Tag noxsl. An equivalent of tag noscript.

["Schimon Jehudah sch@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Michael. Good evening.

In this message, I write statements that appear as agreed conclusions.

These are my own statements, and not challenging these statements does
not means that anyone agrees with them.

On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 18:21:12 -0000
"Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx"
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Not sure what the intended semantics are, but in general it seems odd
> for data to try and regulate what you are allowed to do with it.
>

My intention is not to regulate what to allow, but to inform, or
recommend, how to interact.

After the "browser war" PsyOp, some people are still victims of the
catastrophal combination of the so called HTML5 teechnologies (CS3,
Canvas, and more eavesdrop of ECMAScript and HTTP).

Since some people are forced to interact with this foisted bundle of
technologies, it would be useful to visually inform them, by those
"internet browsers" that a document is meant to be realized with
software that support XSLT. Would it not be useful?

Best,
Schimon

> Sent from my PinePhone*
>

* Edited.

> > On 2 Jan 2026, at 14:57, Schimon Jehudah sch@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > o;?If so,then we should deprecate their products.
> >
> > Since over a couple of decades ago, it was planned to utilize XML
> > (and XSLT) as 'HTML', not the SGML variant known as HTML5.
> >
> > Atom and XSLT suffice to publish content.
> >
> > We should ignore those that insist of ECMAScript and invalid XML
> > (i.e. HTML).
> >
> > Schimon
> >
> >> On Fri, 2 Jan 2026 13:35:53 -0000
> >> "Willem Van Lishout willemvanlishout@xxxxxxxxx"
> >> <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> If the browser vendors get their way, this tag will become
> >> redundant rather soon.
> >>
> >>> On Jan 2, 2026, 11:30, at 11:30, "Schimon Jehudah
> >>> sch@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> Greetings.
> >>>
> >>> I was wondering, whether this could be a possible directive in
> >>> HTML and XML documents.
> >>>
> >>> <noxsl>
> >>> <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="0; url=?xsl=0"/>
> >>> </noxsl>
> >>>
> >>> What do you think of it?
> >>>
> >>> Happy new year,
> >>> Schimon