Subject: Publisher's association on DRM From: "Hamaker, Chuck" <cahamake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:04:02 -0400 |
Digital Rights Management - three point policy- Publishers Association (UK) On the PA website: <http://www.publishers.org.uk/paweb/paweb.nsf/pubframe!Open> Select Guidelines then under Copyright select Digital Rights Management - three point policy <http://www.publishers.org.uk/paweb/PAweb.nsf/0/A998A1C8698297A180256C320052 6B3B!opendocument> A statement of principles, eschewing one size fits all solutions, and calling for publishers to be actively involved in standards setting, working for interoperable international standards, principles I found particularly striking in the policy: "We should support appropriate International Standards and the process should be industry led. We should oppose any proposals for legislation on technical issues." "These (DRM Systems) should not be standardised. Publishers (not necessarily collectively) should work out what sort of DRM best suits their preferred Business Model. The Trade Association should seek to ensure that a choice is open to them" And of particular interest to me as a librarian- the third point: "3. DRMs should be positively presented as a publisher / customer facilitating medium and not a means of 'blocking' access. Rightsholders will acquire the "image" conferred by whatever sort of DRM approach (positive or negative) they adopt (with consequent PR implications)." In other words they are saying, don't treat your customers as thieves! Chuck Hamaker Associate University Librarian for Collections and Technical Services Atkins Library University of North Carolina Charlotte 704 687-2825
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: reserve question, Laurie Urquiaga | Thread | Re: Publisher's association on DRM, Seth Johnson |
reserve question, Neely, Linda G. | Date | Re: Publisher's association on DRM, Seth Johnson |
Month |