Subject: Re: Photographing purchased objects From: Bryan Carson <bryan.m.carson@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:12:21 -0600 |
There are a couple of items we need to distinguish here:That sounds like a good summary of the issues. Second, I agree with the following statement:
a) 3-D models of real bones
b) the original photographs of the 3-D models
c) handouts of the photographs
First of all, non-textual works like photographs, paintings, and architectural plans are eligible for copyright protection. The question is the extent of the creativity involved in creating them.I was sloppy in my initial statement that the bones are "not writing," which incorrectly implied that only "writing" is protected. (Unacceptably sloppy.) Needless to say, 17 U.S.C. ' 102 applies copyright to the following types of items:
However, I do not agree that the bones would be protected by copyright because they do not fit within any of these categories. Models can be protected, but not if they are factual (which these clearly are) and do not exhibit creativity. That is why I don't believe that the bones are subject to copyright. (On the other hand, if they were bones of an alien from Mars. . . .)(1) literary works; (2) musical works, including any accompanying words; (3) dramatic works, including any accompanying music; (4) pantomimes and choreographic works; (5) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; (6) motion pictures and other audiovisual works; (7) sound recordings; and (8) architectural works.
Whether photographs of a copyrighted work are derivative works is the subject of deep disagreement among courts and commentators alike. See 1 MELVILLE B. NIMMER & DAVID NIMMER, NIMMER ON COPYRIGHT ' 3.03[C][1], at 3-20.3 (Aug. 2009). The district court held that Schrock's photos came within the definition of derivative works because they "recast, transformed, or adapted" the three-dimensional toys into a different, two-dimensional medium. For this conclusion the judge relied in part on language in Gracen and in the Ninth Circuit's decision in Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits, Inc., 225 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2000), recognizing, however, that neither decision directly decided the matter. Gracen did not involve photographs at all, and although Ets-Hokin did, the Ninth Circuit ultimately sidestepped the derivative-works question and rested its decision on other grounds. Id. at 1081.I haven't tracked down the the citations in the opinion (in my copious lack-of-spare-time), but this may be an interesting line of inquiry to pursue.
The judge also cited other decisions in this circuit that appear to support the conclusion that photographs are derivative works, but these, too (and again, as the judge properly acknowledged), did not directly address the question. Ty, Inc. v. Publ'ns Int'l., 292 F.3d 512, 519 (7th Cir. 2002), involved unauthorized "Beanie Babies" collector's guides that incorporated photographs of the popular beanbag plush toys into the text. We said there that "photographs of Beanie Babies are derivative works from the copyrighted Beanie Babies themselves," but this statement was based entirely on the parties' concession that the photographs were derivative works. Id. Saturday Evening Post Co. v. Rumbleseat Press, Inc., 816 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1987), made a passing remark suggesting that photographs of Norman Rockwell illustrations were derivative works, but that was not an issue in the case, id. at 1201; the issue instead was whether certain terms in a licensing agreement (specifically, no-contest and arbitration clauses) were enforceable, id. at 1193.
-- Bryan M. Carson, J.D., M.I.L.S., Ed.D. Special Assistant to the Dean for Grants & Projects/ Coordinator of Reference & Instructional Services Western Kentucky University Libraries Author, "The Law of Libraries and Archives" (Scarecrow Press)
1906 College Heights Blvd. #11067 Bowling Green, Kentucky 42101-1067 Phone: 270-745-5007; Fax: 270-745-2275bryan.carson@xxxxxxx | bryan.m.carson@xxxxxxxxx
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Photographing purchased objects, Kevin Hawkins | Thread | RE: Photographing purchased objects, Croft, Janet B. |
Version 77, Scholarly Electronic Pu, Charles W. Bailey, J | Date | RE: Photographing purchased objects, Croft, Janet B. |
Month |