Subject: RE: E-Reserves question From: "Peter B. Hirtle" <pbh6@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2011 16:15:41 -0400 |
On the issue of whether a whether a use is a first use or a subsequent use in the fair use analysis, I would direct Sandy to the position statement by Georgia Harper and Peggy Hoon on e-reserves found at http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/copyright/fairuse/fairuseandelectronicr eserves/index.cfm. It makes no mention of subsequent use of the same item as part of the fair use analysis. This makes sense, since there is also no mention of first or subsequent use in the statute, which simply states that copies made for use in the classroom are normally not an infringement of copyright. We all believe that it is legal for a faculty member to assign a chapter or article as part of the requirements of a course. And I think most people (other than publishers) believe that it should be legal for the student to make a personal copy of an assigned article or chapter, provided that the copying does not substitute for the purchase of the book or journal. Since there are different students in the course every semester, the fair use clock naturally should reset for new students at the start of each term. Peter Hirtle
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: E-Reserves question, Kevin Smith | Thread | RE: E-Reserves question, Sandy Thatcher |
Re: E-Reserves question, Kevin Smith | Date | Re: E-Reserves question, Kevin Smith |
Month |