Re: [digital-copyright] Re: Reproducing visual art

["Robert Thomas Hayes Link" <rl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> why would [X] not be considered a fair use?

This is not the place to start one's analysis. Why ever use content
that could in any way draw a suit, even a winnable one? When there is
so much material free of such liability, why risk otherwise, save
under mutually agreed to, negotiated at arms-length, contract truly
agreeable to all stake-holders?

"IP" has blown the 20th Century all out of proportion. The transaction
costs of using 20th Century content make it mostly not worth the
bother.

Peace,

--
properclinic.com
unclog courts
go debian