Subject: Re: [digital-copyright] Re: Reproducing visual art From: "Sanfilippo, Sarah" <ssanfilippo@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:57:38 -0400 |
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this discussion! I appreciate the help from those more knowledgeable than I. I have sent the information gathered here to the office creating the program, and they will take it from there. Thanks again, and have a wonderful weekend! Sarah* Sarah K. Sanfilippo* Director of Library Resources Southern Vermont College Library Bennington, VT 05201 802.447.6312 svc.libguides.com/library <http://cardcatalog.svc.edu> www.facebook.com/SVCLibrary www.svc.edu *Knowing how to think empowers you far beyond those who know only what to think.* Neil deGrasse Tyson On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Robert Thomas Hayes Link <rl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > > why would [X] not be considered a fair use? > > This is not the place to start one's analysis. Why ever use content > that could in any way draw a suit, even a winnable one? When there is > so much material free of such liability, why risk otherwise, save > under mutually agreed to, negotiated at arms-length, contract truly > agreeable to all stake-holders? > > "IP" has blown the 20th Century all out of proportion. The transaction > costs of using 20th Century content make it mostly not worth the > bother. > > Peace, > > -- > properclinic.com > unclog courts > go debian
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [digital-copyright] Re: Reprodu, Robert Thomas Hayes | Thread | RE: [digital-copyright] Re: Reprodu, Davis, Rick K. |
Re: [digital-copyright] Re: Reprodu, Robert Thomas Hayes | Date | Re: [digital-copyright] Re: Reprodu, Brandon Butler |
Month |