Subject: Re: R: [stella] New project - RPG engine From: Nick S Bensema <nickb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 12:26:22 -0700 (MST) |
>But I think we might all agree that the IMPORTANT thing is the gameplay and >the person who will be experiencing it. From this pov, IMHO, there's no >comparison. Who wants to wait for a multiload game? Or even a single load >game, if they have a choice? Most people with Superchargers and SC Frogger never look at a PB Frogger again. It works with Dragonstomper, though it is a bit "on rails". Since the proposed game is not, maybe the Supercharger wouldn't be such a good idea because the player would have to rewind the tape and/or muck about with the CD player constantly. A game that might be better suited for the Supercharger would be the Space Taxi game I talked about in an earlier post that went to the poster instead of the list. (FYI, it was implying that Troutman's rescue game has become slightly similar to Space Taxi in that you can land on the guys and crush them). You may be saying, Space Taxi is an action game! Certainly it's LESS suited for the Supercharger than an RPG. Well, you would think so, but the beauty of using different loads for different sections is that you can put more than just another 2K of level data and some new enemy graphics in there. You can make phases of a game completely different, sacrificing code not needed for one level to make room for new features in another. This applies to RPGs as well. Suppose you want a level where instead of gravity, there's a black hole you're getting sucked into, another level where little artillery cannons are shooting at you, and another level where the platforms are moving around all the time. Those are all really cool features and I'm pretty sure each of them is in the real Space Taxi. Perhaps you could fit it all in 16K, but it would be a mess to organize it to make the most of that 16k. But with the Supercharger, you can put the black hole gravity in one load, the cannons in another load, and moving platforms in yet another load. And all three levels might be coded by different programmers without any fear whatsoever of stepping on each other's toes. In RPG's, this could be used to create puzzles and advanced-level monsters. RPG's lose the advantage Space Taxi has because in Space Taxi, levels are played one at a time sequentially*, while in an RPG it'd be nice to move around. It also gains something in that in 16K, there might not be room for both code AND text, if text is going to be a part of this. And the Dragonstomper approach worked for most people. * the Commodore 64 version had a "random play" mode, but if the loads are "flexible" enough, a CD player in random mode might have the same effect. -- Archives updated once/day at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsubscribing and other info at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: R: [stella] New project - RPG e, Chris Wilkson - MCD | Thread | Re: R: [stella] New project - RPG e, Erik K Mooney |
Re: R: [stella] New project - RPG e, Chris Wilkson - MCD | Date | R: R: [stella] Atari Patents, Piero Cavina |
Month |