Subject: Re: [stella] Does this look right? (clock) From: emooney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Erik Mooney) Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 16:37:14 GMT |
>>inc DAYS ;of course, you could extend this to weeks, months, etc. > >you're kidding, aren't you? :-) Well, it is cheaper to buy a 2600 deck with hookups for $10 to play a virtual pet than to buy the real thing for $20-$30... I recently set a record by having Windows 95 running for 92 hours straight without crashing... wonder what the record is for a 2600 :) Most virtual pets get 1-3 months per "life".. could the 2600 approach that? -- Archives updated once/day at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsubscribing and other info at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Does this look right? , Piero Cavina | Thread | Re: [stella] Does this look right? , Greg Troutman |
Re: [stella] Does this look right? , Piero Cavina | Date | Re: [stella] Does this look right? , Erik Mooney |
Month |