Re: [stella] Does this look right? (clock)

Subject: Re: [stella] Does this look right? (clock)
From: emooney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Erik Mooney)
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 16:37:14 GMT
>>inc DAYS         ;of course, you could extend this to weeks, months, etc.
>you're kidding, aren't you? :-)

Well, it is cheaper to buy a 2600 deck with hookups for $10 to play a
virtual pet than to buy the real thing for $20-$30...

I recently set a record by having Windows 95 running for 92 hours straight
without crashing... wonder what the record is for a 2600 :)  Most virtual
pets get 1-3 months per "life".. could the 2600 approach that?

Archives updated once/day at
Unsubscribing and other info at

Current Thread