Subject: Re: [stella] Does this look right? (clock) From: crackers@xxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 03:46:10 -0400 (EDT) |
In article , you wrote: >In article <3434cdb3.1871992@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, you wrote: >>>>inc DAYS ;of course, you could extend this to weeks, months, etc. >>> >>>you're kidding, aren't you? :-) >> >>Well, it is cheaper to buy a 2600 deck with hookups for $10 to play a >>virtual pet than to buy the real thing for $20-$30... >> >>I recently set a record by having Windows 95 running for 92 hours straight >>without crashing... wonder what the record is for a 2600 :) Most virtual >>pets get 1-3 months per "life".. could the 2600 approach that? >~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~^~ > >The pet I bought to get a feel for what a virtual pet was only had a life >span of 8 days max. Once it died I put it away in it's box. My 5 year old >wants one for X-mas and I managed to keep this one hidden from him while >I was experimenting with it. > >But that's what I figure. People will probably just use a spare 2600 and >an old B&W TV and set this thing up in a corner somewhere. > >It'll even make an interesting conversation piece for people who don't >even collect the Atari 2600. > > CRACKERS > (2600s as decoration from hell!!!) -- Accordionist - Wethifl Musician - Atari 2600 Collector | /\/\ *NEW CrAB URL* http://www.hwcn.org/~ad329/crab.html ***| \^^/ Bira Bira Devotee - FES Member - Samurai Pizza Cats Fan| =\/= -- Archives updated once/day at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsubscribing and other info at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Does this look right? , crackers | Thread | Re: [stella] Does this look right? , Chris Wilkson - MCD |
[stella] More Clock Woes, crackers | Date | Re: [stella] Does this look right? , crackers |
Month |