Subject: RE: [stella] A new version of an old assembler. From: Eckhard Stolberg <Eckhard_Stolberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 1998 20:59:16 +0200 |
At 15:54 07.07.98 -0700, you wrote: >Well I wanted to play around with the 6502's so-called undocumented >instructions on the 2600, and none of the available assemblers support them. >I didn't modify TASM because it's guiltware, they want money. I did modify >DASM, but a restrictive copyright prohibits my sharing my improvements. I If you can't distribute a modified DASM, would it be possible to post the altered processor definiton code, so that other can compile their own improver version of it. I suppose that was the only part, that needed to be modified to get the undocumented opcodes done, right? Thanks, Eckhard Stolberg -- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] A new version of an ol, Teknovore | Thread | RE: [stella] A new version of an ol, John Saeger |
Re: [stella] Is the list dead? I ha, Chris Wilkson | Date | RE: [stella] A new version of an ol, John Saeger |
Month |