At 06:00 PM 7/8/98 -0700, you wrote:
>I think all you would
>need to do to Distella is to remove the leading dots from the undocumented
>opcodes in table.c. But I haven't tried it. Any volunteers to get Distella
>to disassemble the undocumented opcodes?
Well, there is a little more to it than that, you need to indicate the address
mode in the table for the opcode too, which is fairly easy. I do need to
update Distella because I found an opcode that didn't disassemble correctly
(I wrote it down on one of the numerous pieces of paper adorning my desk).
I have also thought of a couple of algorithms to help in determining the
difference between data and code that could be added... I don't know how
much time I'll have in the next month or so since my wife is due in 9 days :)
I'll try and look at it tonight! (But don't hold your breath :)
>Of course Bob is still more than welcome to include this file in the
>official release of DASM.
Well, I would be happy to put the modified version on my webpage. I got the
v2.12 (I think that is is) to compile under MS VC++ 5.0, but it is only the
32-bit DOS version (Eckhard! Are you up for another compilation?). When I
e-mailed Matt about putting the altered code on my page, he was more than
happy let me (though it took about 2 or 3 months to get a reply). I can also
send him a new e-mail and see if he will simply release the program into the
public domain.
Later,
Bob
--
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/stella.html
