Subject: Re: [stella] Player data loading...semi newbie From: "B. Watson" <urchlay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 11:23:36 -0400 (EDT) |
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Thomas Jentzsch wrote: > Glenn Saunders wrote: > > But to me, the processor directive should indicate the legal instruction > > set, not a command line switch. The only question is whether to always > > allow illegal opcodes when you do "processor 6502" or not. If you want to > > turn it off, I happen to prefer another processor directive, like 6502i (for > > illegal) where the default 6502 is off, or 6502s (for strict) if the default > > 6502 has illegal opcodes. > > Agreed. Since most people were using DASM without illegal opcode > support, we should add a new directive for illegal opcodes (6502i). Already done. Thomas, are you the maintainer of DASM? I'm working on this mess of code, I'd like to get it into the `official' release of DASM, rather than just muddying the waters by putting out my own version. B. - Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Player data loading..., Thomas Jentzsch | Thread | Re: Aw: Re: [stella] Player data lo, Glenn Saunders |
Re: Aw: Re: Aw: Re: [stella] Player, B. Watson | Date | Re: [stella] DASM and IDE, Thomas Jentzsch |
Month |